Book review: “The Wannsee Conference and the Final Solution” by Mark Roseman

About midway through “The Wannsee Conference and the Final Solution” by Mark Roseman, I got to wondering how writers like Roseman do it.

I mean, writers who spend a good chunk of their lives — or, for some, their entire careers — studying the Holocaust.

It is, to my mind, a high calling, sifting through the orders, accounts, files, memoirs, photos, diaries, trial testimony and other documents to nail down the facts and wrestle with the important questions, such as: How could this have happened? What does the Holocaust say about human nature? To what extent was Hitler responsible? The German people? The anti-Semitism of the rest of the world?

More than nuclear weapons, more than climate change, more than capitalism, terrorism or religious fundamentalism, the Holocaust is the central issue of humanity today. And probably for centuries to come.

Human beings killed human beings in a conscious, factory-like, bureaucratically buttressed endeavor for no reason — for lack of a threat — except that the people were of a certain religion, culture and “race.”

The killing of millions of Jews was the culmination of the murderous style of government that the Nazis used to grab and keep power, and kept them there through the end of World War II. Others were targeted as well, but not as ruthlessly, not as comprehensively: homosexuals, gypsies, the mentally ill, the Polish leadership, Russian soldiers. Millions of Russian POWs, for instance, died of neglect. The difference was that the slaying of Jews was an active effort by Hitler’s Germany, an active effort to kill each and every one of them.

So, the role of people like Roseman, an English historian, is essential, especially now as the last living killers, enablers and victims are dying off. Already Holocaust-denial is a cottage industry in academic and political circles throughout the world. Getting as much detail into the historical record today lays the foundation for the Holocaust studies that will be conducted for generations into the future.

Yet, how do people like Roseman do it?

How do they handle the emotional toll that must come with looking full-face at the killers and the slain?

Roseman, who also wrote “A Past in Hiding,” the story of a Jewish woman who survived in Germany during the war, is dealing in this book with a January 20, 1942 meeting held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee and attended by 15 high-ranking (but not the highest-ranking) Nazi party and German military leaders.

The purpose: To discuss the “evacuation” of Jews from German-held lands. Ostensibly, “evacuation” meant moving them — all of them — to somewhere in the East. But it’s clear from Roseman’s analysis as well as the minutes of the meeting (known as the Wannsee Protocol) that “evacuation” was a euphemism of elimination, for an actively carried-out mass murder on a scale never before seen in human history.

Roseman writes that the euphemism was so thin as to be non-existent: “On the one hand, the [Wannsee Protocol] is coy about killing and talks of ‘evacuation of Jews to the East.’ On the other hand, the language about eliminating Jewish workers [who are strong enough to survive months of forced labor] is so open, and the implications for the rest is so clear, as to render the euphemisms pointless as a disguise…

“Euphemisms were [the Reich security force’s] normal mode of communicating about murder and would have served here to remind the document’s recipients of the codes they should use. At the same time it was so vital to ensure the [meeting’s] participants’ shared knowledge in the killing program that caution was abandoned.”

The subtitle of Roseman’s book is “A Reconsideration.” Since the discovery of the Protocol in the files of one of the participants in 1947, there has been debate over just how significant the Wannsee Conference was. Certainly, its language of “evacuation” and its bureaucratically focused minutiae make it a strikingly evocative document. But how important in the history of the Holocaust?

Roseman takes great pains to place the Conference in its historical setting, using the first half of the book (78 pages) to chronicle the movement of Hitler, the Nazis and the German military from the threats of Mein Kampf to mass murder (as in the passive neglect that led to the deaths of Russian prisoners by starvation and disease), and then from mass murder to genocide.

His discussion of the meeting takes up another 60 pages, and he finishes with 17 pages on its aftermath.

His conclusion: “Wannsee itself was not the moment of decision. Nobody at Wannsee…was senior enough to decide such matters…The Wannsee Protocol was rather a signpost indicating that genocide had become the official policy.”

In the after-glow of the meeting, its organizers paused for a moment for a drink before heading off to carry out the next steps in the Final Solution. They were pleased with themselves: “Speaking to one another with great politeness, sipping their cognac, [they] really had cleared the way for genocide.”

It’s a chilling image. But there’s one even more disturbing.

It comes halfway through the book when Roseman writes about a memo that Adolf Eichmann, one of those conference organizers, received from another bureaucrat. The memo noted that those responsible for all the Jews who had been and would be rounded up were going to face problems in winter when there wouldn’t be food enough to feed their captives.

So, the writer had this idea: “It should be seriously considered if the most human solution would not be to kill those Jews not capable of work with some quick acting means. This would certainly be more pleasant than allowing them to starve to death.”

So, the Holocaust was “humane.” And it was “more pleasant” than other options — such as, life.

That’s a glimpse into the heart of darkness that was the Holocaust.

And it’s why I can’t help wondering how Roseman and other Holocaust historians are able to handle the emotional strain of studying the perpetrators of the mass killings.

How can they not look away?

Patrick T. Reardon

1 Comment

  • James E. Girzone Posted February 8, 2012 7:10 am

    It is so very difficult to give dedicated, considered thought to such an undertaking such as the WANNSEE CONFERENCE without one’s mind mobilizing restraints and creating diversions. But it must be done as well as HUMANLY possible; IT happened and IT happened in one of EUROPE’S most cultured and educated Countries; the Land of Great Composers, Philosophers, Mathematicians, Physicists, Doctors, Successful Merchants, Distinguished Professors of every imaginable subject at Distinguished Universities, Clergy of all Christian denominations and on, and on, and on….., IT happened! THE HORROR OF HORRORS; the very essence of the phrase: “MAN’S INHUMANITY TO MAN”…., .. IT COULD NOT CONCEIVABLY HAVE BEEN WORSE, we tell ourselves, NEVER AGAIN,– BUT we have seen ‘shades’ of it in other places since…. albeit on a much lesser scale but no less horrific.

    This ALMOST so innocent sounding name, the WANNSEE CONFERENCE, so evil was the euphemistic title given to a conspirancey antithetical to the very essence of what constitutes a civilized human soul and being with but the least of conscience say nothing of those with well-defined conscience as those listed above, who should have served, with their lives if need demanded, as the bulwark of opposition against these undisguised evil monsters.

    A transcript of the precisely 85 minute Conference resides with the NUREMBURG TRIAL PROCEEDINGS but detailed summaries are available along with the list of attendees, led by the Head of Hitler’s SS (Secret Service) Reinhard HEYDRICH WHO CHAIRED THE COMMITTEE AND CHARGED EACH ATTENDEE WITH SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS AND DUTIES….. for THE FINAL SOLUTION OF THE JEWISH PROBLEM IN ALL OF EUROPE. This “ptoblem” involved the planned literal, ruthless murder in the most grotesque manner of over 11,000,000 Jewish women children, babies and men. This material MUST be read by every human being on the face of G-D’S EARTH. This is a blemish on the soul of humanity. How such can ever be purged is beyond my intellectual capacity to discern. Reading of this CONFERENCE is but a feeble start and delving deeper will test one’s moral strength and Eternal Soul.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *